Experts in CMT

CMT Variant Mechanisms Browser

Every Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) subtype results from a mutation in a single gene. The gene identifies the cause, but not the functional mechanism of pathogenicity.

Pathogenic variants act through a varying set of mechanisms. A variant can reduce or abolish the protein’s normal activity: a loss-of-function that ranges from haploinsufficiency through hypomorphic alleles to biallelic null mutations. It can produce a mutant protein that interferes with its normal counterpart, a dominant-negative effect that lowers net function through active disruption rather than simple absence. Or it can confer a novel toxic activity or an excess of the protein’s normal activity: a toxic gain-of-function that works through neomorphic activity (including toxic aggregation), overactivity, gene-dosage excess, or a pathogenic repeat expansion. Some subtypes result from more than one of these mechanisms, and for others, the causative gene or its mechanism is not yet settled.

This table presents, for each CMT subtype, the mechanism supported by current evidence. Each row is one subtype. The Mechanism column gives the call: Loss of Function, Dominant-Negative, Toxic Gain of Function, Complex, or Unknown. Expanding a row shows the mechanistic basis, the specific molecular route behind the call, followed by the prediction the evidence supports, and the rationale for the call.

Because the call is made one subtype at a time, a single gene can appear under different mechanisms across its subtypes. MFN2 is one example: its dominant alleles cause CMT2A through a dominant-negative effect, while its biallelic alleles cause CMT2A2B through loss of function. Each subtype has its own call, and the table keeps them separate rather than collapsing the gene into a single label.

How the Calls Are Made

Each call results from a machine-learning-assisted structured review of the primary literature, OMIM, GeneReviews, and the studies that underpin them. Every subtype carries a computed confidence level, the prediction basis, and a rationale, so the basis for a call is shown rather than asserted. The call is a single value, and the mechanistic basis, prediction, and rationale beneath it describe that value.

Confidence is graded in three steps:

  • High: a mechanism established by converging genetic and functional evidence.
  • Medium: a single well-supported mechanism resting on narrower or more indirect data.
  • Low: a call drawn when only a few reports are available, or inferred from the pattern of inheritance, where the mechanism has not been shown directly.

Complex carries the strictest reading. A subtype is called Complex only when its alleles genuinely split across mechanisms, and the evidence does not resolve to a single mechanism. CMT1B (MPZ) meets this bar: most dominant alleles act through a toxic gain and dominant-negative disruption of P0 adhesion, while a separate set of deficiency alleles produces a milder loss of function, so the subtype as a whole is mixed. When the evidence supports a single route, the subtype keeps a single call, and the rationale explains the why.

What the Table Does Not Claim

Unknown is a finding, not a blank. It denotes either a subtype with no identified causative gene or a mechanism that the literature has not yet resolved. In both cases, it reflects the current limit of the evidence rather than a gap in the table. Low-confidence calls and a small set of contested subtypes remain open to expert review and revision, and the table is built to update as these are adjudicated and new studies arrive.

This page is intended as an educational and reference resource only. It does not provide medical advice, variant interpretation, diagnostic guidance, or disease management recommendations. Genetic testing, diagnosis, and healthcare decisions should always be made in consultation with a qualified healthcare professional.

CMT Variant Mechanisms Browser

The gene identifies a subtype's cause. The variant mechanism explains the how. For each CMT subtype, this browser presents the mechanism and the evidence supporting it.

170+ classified subtypes
5 mechanism categories
150+ with a resolved mechanism
Gene Subtype Inheritance Mechanism Confidence Details

Explore More

The Dorsal Root

More From The Dorsal Root
Close-up of a doctor’s hand holding a prescription pad while a patient’s wrist is wrapped with metal chains.

When Medicine Lost Its Compass

Evidence failed not because it was wrong, but because it was weaponized. I lived the downstream effects of that failure for more than a decade. This is what happens when medicine forgets that data always ends in a human being.

Illustrated graphic showing large ‘404’ numerals with people interacting with data screens and servers, alongside text reading ‘CMT Genetic Testing Error 404: Gene Not Found’ and ‘Examining Why Less Than Half of All Who Have Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Are Not Able to Obtain Genetic Confirmation of Their Disease.

Error 404: Gene Not Found

CMT genetic testing often fails to identify the cause of the disease, even when comprehensive panels are used. Here, we discuss why this happens, what genetic tests can and cannot do, and why a negative result still matters.

Illustrated cover graphic showing a split landform with branching directional arrows, two people with question marks above their heads, and the title ‘SORD Deficiency: Decoding This Newly Discovered and Confusing CMT Subtype.

CMT-SORD: What Is This Unique CMT Subtype?

CMT-SORD is a newly discovered CMT subtype driven by toxic sorbitol accumulation. This article explains how "SORD" works, why this subtype is different, and how it led to the fastest-moving therapeutic program in CMT history.